PEOPLE

People and recognition

Roles in the project, profiles published with consent, and credit for every kind of contribution.

This page is still being reviewed by our scientific, clinical and legal experts. It describes plans, not finished work.

8 published profiles

Core team

Aleksandr Stefanin

Technical Lead

MoreLess – Aleksandr Stefanin

Architecture decisions, code review quality and the RFC process; the project's platform, annotation infrastructure and machine learning pipelines.

Full profile →

Clinical contributors

Egor Golovko

Clinical Lead

MoreLess – Egor Golovko

Urology

Deciding voice on clinical questions

The deciding voice on clinical questions, annotation classes and rules, disputed cases and medical wording.

Full profile →

Contributors

The roles behind the work

The roles the project needs. Some are still open: if one fits you, see how to contribute.

Scientific Lead

Research direction, scientific review and grant applications.

Clinical Lead

A practicing surgeon with the deciding voice on clinical questions, annotation rules and medical language.

Technical Lead

Technical architecture, review and reproducibility standards.

Video & segmentation

2D segmentation, video models and the architecture sandbox.

3D & reconstruction

Volumetric research and 3D model pipelines.

Data & MLOps

Data versions, de-identification checks and training infrastructure.

Quality & evaluation

Annotation agreement, tests, edge cases and evaluation.

Platform & full-stack

The website, documentation platform and research interfaces.

Community & communications

Editorial work, outreach and conference coordination.

Coordination & partnerships

Volunteer onboarding, roadmap and academic partnerships.

Roles in the project

The work is organised into roles: scientific direction, engineering, data, quality, clinical review, communications and coordination. Some roles are still open – if one fits you, see Contribute.

The clinical lead is a separate role

The clinical lead is a practising surgeon with the deciding voice on annotation classes, disputed boundaries and medical wording. Code review or a vote cannot replace that responsibility. The project’s own annotation starts only once there is a clinical lead and a guideline they have approved.

We credit work, not just commits

Contribution is more than code: methodology, data preparation, testing, writing, translation, teaching and organising all count. Recognition is based on accepted results, not job titles.

Surgeon annotators become co-authors of publications after at least 20 hours of annotated and accepted material, under a contribution agreement.

Profiles are optional

A profile is published only with the contributor’s consent. Photo, city, biography and links are optional; naming a clinic requires its written permission. To change or remove a profile, follow the privacy process.

How to join this list