BENCHMARK

Benchmark: comparing models fairly

The rules for comparing models: patient-level splits, equal budgets and a held-out test.

This page is still being reviewed by our scientific, clinical and legal experts. It describes plans, not finished work.
–
Held-out test accesses

Not reported. No verified benchmark snapshot is connected; this is not a zero.

Leaderboard – awaiting verified submissions
Model / teamTaskDataset & splitMetric ± CISource
No verified baseline or external submission has been imported. No ranking is claimed.

Validation is not the test set. Results must identify their dataset and split.

What the benchmark is for

The benchmark lets models be compared fairly and reproducibly. It is an engineering comparison, not a clinical evaluation. There are no results yet.

Tasks: instrument and anatomy segmentation, surgical phase recognition, 3D segmentation and smoke removal. Each task has its own metrics, and we do not collapse them into a single “overall score”.

The same conditions for everyone

  • Patient-level splits. Frames from one operation can never be in both training and evaluation.
  • Equal budget. Epochs, GPU hours and batch size are comparable; unavoidable differences are stated.
  • At least three runs per configuration: individual values, the mean and a confidence interval.
  • Ablations for any architectural change, on the same split and budget.

Validation and the held-out test

Development uses the validation set only. The held-out test is used at most once per release, and every use shows on a counter. Before that, another person must reproduce the result. Experiment automation has no access to the held-out test.

How to submit a result

Submissions will open later. A submission will need:

  • the task, code version, configuration and data version;
  • complete run records and compute conditions;
  • ablations and known limitations;
  • licenses and the origin of materials.

Results will appear on the leaderboard and in the experiment log.